Deep Dives

Corruption · Public money · Updated October 13, 2026 · 86 sources

Paid for.

The question

Is public money being used to promote the president himself?

What the record shows

The government has put the president’s face or message in front of the public in at least four ways: banners of his face paid for by five federal agencies, a television ad carrying his message under the line “paid for by the U.S. government,” a 24-hour White House stream of its own highlights, and a White House app pushed onto federal employees’ work phones.

Federal spending laws have barred taxpayer spending “for publicity or propaganda purposes” since 1951. On October 12 a federal judge found the plaintiffs likely to succeed in showing the television ads violated that ban; the banners, the stream and the app have not been tested.

Sen. Schiff ↗Common Cause v. Department of Homeland Security ↗

Where it stands A federal judge orders the taxpayer-funded ads off the air As of Oct 13 ↓

The newest examples began on the night of September 23, 2026: a thirty-second spot during conservative shows on Fox News and Newsmax. Images of the president, the “largest tax cuts in history,” a promise that “America will never be a communist country,” and a line of small text at the bottom: “paid for by the U.S. government.” The White House calls it a public service announcement. Within five days there were at least four spots, one of them a rerun of a 2024 Trump campaign ad, airing during NFL games.

Below: what each item cost and who paid, the record in order, the explanations set against the documents, who objected and who defended it, the rules that apply, and what to watch. Every fact is sourced. Every opinion is labeled.

A Republican senator, on the ad:

“It’s inappropriate. It’s not like they need a GoFundMe page to have the dollars to do that sort of ad and they could do it. But using taxpayer dollars, it feels like Viktor Orban.”

Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, September 2026

Associated Press ↗

$1.12M
In contracts for banners of the president, found so far
5
Federal agencies paying for those banners
$21.71M
Spent on the ads, by AdImpact’s partial count, out of border-security funds
1951
The year spending laws first barred “publicity or propaganda”

Everything outside the labeled take is reporting: 86 sources, each fact linked to where it came from, every quotation checked word for word. Our opinion comes near the end, set apart and easy to skip. How this page is built ↓

As of October 13, 2026

Where it stands

Status

A federal judge orders the taxpayer-funded ads off the air

On October 11, Judge Jennifer L. Rochon of the Southern District of New York halted the ads for 14 days in a suit brought by Common Cause, staying CBP’s $20 million purchase order and ordering remaining placements canceled. The Justice Department did not contest the merits; it argued the ads were ending anyway. By October 12, AdImpact counted $21,705,138 in government spending on five ads. Trump had said on October 5 that his super PAC would pay for future ads, and on October 6, asked about repaying what was spent, said, “we’ll decide.” The FAA banner contract runs through 2027.

What to watch

  • Nov 3, 2026 Election Day. The ad ran six weeks before the midterms. Watch whether more spots carrying the government disclaimer run before the vote, and whether DHS answers the senators’ questions about the border money.
  • Open The senators’ 48 hours. Sens. Murray and Murphy asked DHS on September 29 for a breakdown of the funds, copies of the contracts and who directed them, within 48 hours, copying the department’s inspector general. Hassan’s earlier questions on cost and contractors are also unanswered.

    Senate Appropriations Committee ↗CBS News ↗

  • Open GAO. Reps. Raskin and Whitesides asked GAO on October 1 to identify the money and rule on whether the ads are legal. GAO acts on congressional requests and says it is deciding whether to take this one. A GAO opinion would test the propaganda restriction directly.

    The Daily Beast ↗Ars Technica ↗

  • Oct 25, 2026 The court order runs out. Judge Rochon’s order lasts 14 days from October 11 unless the court extends it. The Democratic National Committee has sued separately.

    Common Cause v. Department of Homeland Securit… ↗AP ↗

  • Open The other complaints. Public Citizen’s, filed September 25 with GAO and the Office of Special Counsel and September 29 with the FCC and FTC, and CREW’s, filed September 30 with DHS’s inspector general. The FCC chairman has said he sees no reason for review. None of the others has acted.

    Public Citizen ↗Public Citizen ↗CREW ↗Deadline ↗

  • Through 2027 The FAA banners. The FAA’s banner contract runs through 2027.

    The Independent ↗

Who pays, and how much

The ledger

Each item, the part of the government paying for it, and the amount where one has been made public. Amounts are contract values and releases as reported, not necessarily what has been spent.

When What Paid by Amount
The banners $1,122,380 in contracts
Sept 2025 Banners at Agriculture and Labor Agriculture $16,400 for two banners of Trump and Lincoln; Labor about $6,000, including Trump’s portrait over “American Workers First.” A third contract, $33,726 at HHS, paid for “Make America Healthy Again” signs rather than the president’s face.

Axios DC ↗Sen. Schiff ↗CNN ↗

Paid byAgriculture Department, Labor Department $22,400
Feb 2026 Banners at Justice Department headquarters A $892,192.07 base contract plus $54,768 added later, in records Politico obtained

Politico / E&E News ↗The Daily Beast ↗

Paid byJustice Department $946,960
June 2026 Banner at the Interior Department Contract found by Schiff

The Independent ↗

Paid byInterior Department $39,000
July 2026 Banners for the FAA Contract found by Schiff; runs through 2027

The Independent ↗

Paid byFederal Aviation Administration $114,020
The channels
May 2026 The White House app, pushed onto federal work phones Cost not disclosed

Government Executive ↗

Paid byEvery executive-branch agency’s phones Not disclosed
Sept 2026 Trump TV, a 24-hour stream Cost not disclosed. On September 24 the Trump Organization’s trademark company applied to register TRUMP TV for news broadcasting and streaming

NOTUS ↗USPTO ↗

Paid byThe White House Not disclosed
Sept to Oct 2026 The television ads AdImpact’s count for the five ads by the morning of October 12, CBS reported; because the ads are classified as PSAs, AdImpact may not reflect the exact total. A federal judge halted the spending on October 11

CBS News ↗Common Cause v. Department of Homeland Security ↗AP ↗NBC News ↗USAspending.gov ↗

Paid byCustoms and Border Protection funds: CBP asked OMB for $20 million on September 19 and issued a $20 million purchase order to the ad agency the next day, the court record shows $21,705,138
For comparison
Mar 2026 The DHS ad campaign featuring Secretary Noem Ended with her firing

NBC News ↗ProPublica ↗

Paid byHomeland Security $220M

In order

The record

29 documented events over 7 months, from the first banners to the ad. Each links to its sources; each has its own address, so you can send someone a single moment.

September 2025 1 event

  1. Wed Sept 17 Congress

    Sen. Adam Schiff’s office reported that the Agriculture Department spent $16,400 on two banners of Trump and Abraham Lincoln, and the Labor Department about $6,000 on banners including Trump’s portrait over the words “American Workers First.” A third contract, $33,726 at Health and Human Services, paid for “Make America Healthy Again” signs. Schiff called the spending illegal, citing prohibitions in federal spending laws since 1951 on taxpayer spending “for publicity or propaganda purposes.”

    The Labor Department said its banners were made for Labor Day and the country’s 250th anniversary. The White House called Schiff a “serial liar.”

    Axios DC ↗Sen. Schiff ↗CNN ↗Washington Examiner ↗

February 2026 1 event

  1. Thu Feb 19 The administration

    Work crews hung a banner with Trump’s portrait and the words “Make America Safe Again” on the headquarters of the Justice Department. A department spokesperson: “We are proud at this Department of Justice to celebrate 250 years of our great country and our historic work to make America safe again at President Trump’s direction.” Former Republican Rep. Barbara Comstock: “Nothing says Justice is Blind like hanging a Dear Leader Banner at DOJ.”

    CNN ↗AP/Click On Detroit ↗Mediaite ↗

March 2026 2 events

  1. Thu Mar 5 The administration

    Trump fired Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem after a scandal over a $220 million taxpayer-funded advertising campaign that featured her on horseback. The biggest no-bid contract went to a firm incorporated days before it was awarded. Noem had testified that Trump approved the campaign. A White House spokesperson told NBC News: “POTUS did not sign off on a $220 MILLION dollar ad campaign. Absolutely not.”

    NBC News ↗ProPublica ↗The Hill ↗

  2. Fri Mar 27 The administration

    After cryptic teaser videos on its official accounts, the White House released an app with live-streamed briefings, press releases presented as news and an ICE tip line. CNBC reported that it “curates favorable news articles” and left out unfavorable data, such as rising oil prices.

    CNBC ↗The Hill ↗

May 2026 1 event

  1. Fri May 22 The administration

    The federal chief information officer asked agencies to push the app onto government-issued phones. The FAA told its staff it “will automatically install ‘The White House’ application on all FAA-issued iPhones and iPads, as mandated by the White House.” David Nesting, a former deputy chief information officer at the Office of Personnel Management: “It’s just making sure all federal employees are forced to see the same propaganda they push.”

    Government Executive ↗Engadget ↗Raw Story ↗

July 2026 1 event

  1. Thu Jul 16 Congress

    Schiff found $39,000 in contracts for a banner at the Interior Department and $114,020 for the FAA, running through 2027. Records Politico obtained showed the Justice Department paid a $892,192.07 base contract for its banners and $54,768 more. Schiff: “an eight-story high Donald Trump head certainly qualifies as propaganda.”

    The White House did not respond directly to questions about the contracts’ legality. Its spokesman said Schiff was willing “to trash the United States of America during its semiquincentennial celebration simply because he hates President Trump.”

    The Independent ↗Politico / E&E News ↗The Daily Beast ↗

September 2026 18 events

  1. Mon Sept 21 7 p.m. The administration

    Three days after banning three news organizations, the White House launched “Trump TV: The Essentials Station,” a 24-hour stream of its own past video. Its head of digital strategy, Kaelan Dorr, called it “a livestream of the Administration’s greatest hits, unfiltered.” It opened, NOTUS reported, “with a two-month-old clip of the president speaking at Mount Rushmore.”

    NOTUS ↗Newsweek ↗Breitbart ↗

  2. Wed Sept 23 Overnight The administration

    A thirty-second spot of the president’s record and message ran during conservative shows on Fox News and Newsmax, closing with the line “paid for by the U.S. government.” AdImpact put the buy at $14,000. The White House had posted a 15-second version on its official YouTube channel on September 13. It called the ad “educational and unapologetically patriotic” and did not say what agency paid for it.

    Two Republican senators objected. Thom Tillis: “using taxpayer dollars, it feels like Viktor Orban.” John Kennedy: “I don’t generally like to see politicians use public money to pay for their own campaign ads.”

    Associated Press ↗The Independent ↗Mediaite ↗The White House ↗

  3. Thu Sept 24 The administration

    CBS News reported that the ad began running on national networks, CBS among them, and that a second government-paid ad, recounting the U.S. capture of former Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and featuring Trump and his top Cabinet officials, aired on CBS stations and other networks that evening. There are 30- and 60-second versions. The government produced the content and paid for the air time through an ad agency, CBS reported.

    The musician JMSN said he never licensed the song: “I would never authorize my music to be used for ANY political agenda or campaign.” A White House official told CBS the ads “are clearly not political.”

    CBS News ↗The Atlantic ↗

  4. Thu Sept 24 Congress

    Sen. Maggie Hassan asked chief of staff Susie Wiles for the cost, the contractors, the source of the funding and whether money was diverted from federal agencies. The top Democratic appropriators, Sens. Patty Murray and Jack Reed and Reps. Rosa DeLauro and Steny Hoyer, demanded that it be pulled: “This is the sort of government propaganda one might expect in North Korea, not the United States of America, and it is an egregious and illegal misuse of Americans’ hard-earned tax dollars.”

    CBS News ↗

  5. Fri Sept 25 The administration

    A minute-long ad began airing on Newsmax with video of Mount Rushmore at night and clips of Trump’s Fourth of July speech there: “This is only the beginning of the golden age of America.” The White House published “Presidential Public Service Announcements Are Nothing New,” calling the criticism “highly dishonest” and citing a Bush-era Medicare campaign, Obama’s EPA and Biden’s vaccination drive. NBC News noted that the Government Accountability Office had faulted the Bush campaign for not disclosing the government as its source and the Obama one for violating “publicity or propaganda and anti-lobbying provisions.”

    AP ↗The White House ↗NBC News ↗

  6. Fri Sept 25 Press and watchdogs

    Public Citizen filed a complaint alleging the ads violate the laws against using government resources for propaganda and, for the staff involved, the Hatch Act. Co-president Lisa Gilbert: “Taxpayer funds cannot pay for partisan political propaganda.”

    Public Citizen ↗

  7. Sun Sept 27 The administration

    A thirty-second black-and-white spot of Trump walking down a hallway, which the Associated Press called “virtually identical to one that aired in 2024,” ran during Fox’s broadcasts of two NFL games, CNN reported. Trump in it: “We will throw off the sick political class that hates our country. We will rout the fake news media, and we will liberate America from these villains once and for all.” NBC News reported that the government version drops the campaign ending and adds “Paid for by the U.S. government.” AdImpact put spending on the ads at more than $1.7 million.

    AP ↗CNN ↗NBC News ↗

  8. Sun Sept 27 Congress

    Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana, on CBS’s “Face the Nation”: “I don’t think any public official, including President Trump or Kristi Noem or John Kennedy, should spend public money on private ads for themselves.” Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky: “Don’t worry, using taxpayer dollars to run ominous campaign ads of the President has been done before and is completely legal… in banana republics.”

    CBS News ↗Time ↗CNN ↗

  9. Tue Sept 29 Congress

    The Wall Street Journal reported, and NBC News, the Associated Press and CNBC confirmed, that the ads are paid for with Customs and Border Protection money from the 2025 reconciliation law rather than annual appropriations. Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, who chairs the Senate Appropriations Committee, confirmed it on the record, saying “it was taken out of funding that was supposed to be for Customs and Border Protection.” DHS referred questions to the White House. Sens. Patty Murray and Chris Murphy wrote that “it appears DHS has dedicated $20 million to this outrageous scheme” and asked for answers within 48 hours. CNBC found a $20 million CBP contract for a “National Media Campaign” awarded September 20, one day after the budget office released $20 million to CBP under a “Commemorative Events” line; the public record does not yet tie that contract to these ads.

    Wall Street Journal ↗NBC News ↗AP ↗CNBC ↗Senate Appropriations Committee ↗USAspending.gov ↗

  10. Tue Sept 29 Press and watchdogs

    CNN, citing one source familiar with the matter, reported that Trump personally drove the ads, including helping select the imagery and videos, and two Trump advisers told CNN they are made in-house by the White House video team. The Journal, citing people familiar, reported he pushed for them. Both accounts rest on anonymous sources.

    CNN ↗CNBC ↗

  11. Tue Sept 29 Congress

    Majority Leader John Thune: “It’s a great message. I like the message, but it shouldn’t be paid for with taxpayer dollars.” Sen. Thom Tillis: “I hate it. I tell you, it feels like Viktor Orbán talking to the Hungarian people.” White House spokesperson Davis Ingle answered the criticism by calling Trump “the unequivocal leader, best messenger, and unmatched motivator for the Republican Party.”

    The Hill ↗Politico ↗The Independent ↗NBC News ↗

  12. Tue Sept 29 Press and watchdogs

    Public Citizen asked the Federal Communications Commission and the Federal Trade Commission to “direct broadcasters to stop broadcasting” the ads, arguing that because Trump is not a candidate, stations are free to refuse them.

    Public Citizen ↗

  13. Tue Sept 29 The administration

    An administration official told Axios that “The Department of Homeland Security is placing the ad buys using money from an existing budget,” and Axios reported that Trump “is personally selecting which government-funded ads his administration is airing ahead of the midterms,” with more to come. AdImpact counted 2,766 airings from September 23 to 29 on Fox News and the four broadcast networks, CNN reported, with about 30% of the spending on NFL and college football games.

    Axios ↗CNN ↗

  14. Tue Sept 29 Congress

    On the Senate floor, Sen. Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming blocked Sen. Maggie Hassan’s resolution declaring that such ads “should not be paid for by the United States government.” “When a Democratic president tells Americans what to do, it’s a public service,” Lummis said. “When this president tells Americans that liberty is worth defending, it’s suddenly a problem.”

    Washington Post ↗Daily Caller ↗

  15. Wed Sept 30 The administration

    In the Oval Office, Trump said, “Now, if somebody said that that’s wrong, I’ll gladly pay the money, but these are ads for the country,” and, “I’m not promoting a candidate. I’m not promoting myself because I’m not running for office.” It was his first comment on the campaign.

    The Hill ↗USA Today (via AOL) ↗Newsmax (via Yahoo) ↗

  16. Wed Sept 30 The administration

    A fourth spot carrying the government disclaimer began airing. In it Trump says, “This regime will soon learn that no one should challenge the strength and might of the United States,” and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth says, “We didn’t start this war, but under President Trump, we are finishing it.” Which funds paid for it has not been confirmed.

    The Hill ↗

  17. Wed Sept 30 The administration

    FCC Chairman Brendan Carr, a Trump appointee, dismissed Public Citizen’s complaint: “There’s nothing in there that strikes me to merit any sort of FCC review.” Anna Gomez, the commission’s only Democrat, said she “highly” doubts the FCC “is going to do much to investigate it.”

    Deadline ↗Al Jazeera ↗Ars Technica ↗

  18. Wed Sept 30 Press and watchdogs

    Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington asked the inspector general to examine possible violations of the Antideficiency Act, the Purpose Statute and the government-wide ban on “publicity or propaganda” in the 2026 appropriations law.

    CREW ↗

October 2026 5 events

  1. Thu Oct 1 Congress

    Reps. Jamie Raskin, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, and George Whitesides asked GAO to identify the “sources, accounts and total amount” spent and to rule on legality, and the Office of Special Counsel to determine who should be held accountable. It is the first request from members of Congress to GAO, which had told Ars Technica that its “work is done at the request of congressional committees or subcommittees or is statutorily required by public laws.” The letter says “stealing taxpayer dollars to pay for Mr. Trump’s narcissistic ego trips is plainly illegal.”

    Both agencies confirmed receiving it, the Daily Beast reported. GAO spokesperson Sarah Kaczmarek: “GAO has a process it goes through to determine whether we do work and when, which we are working through right now.”

    Reuters (via U.S. News) ↗Washington Examiner ↗The Daily Beast ↗Ars Technica ↗

  2. Fri Oct 2 Press and watchdogs

    CNN reported that the administration has created at least 13 campaign-style ads, including “God Made Trump,” shown at Republicans’ midterm convention, and obtained clips from a Dropbox account “run by LMD, the agency that has been given the government contract for the ad buys.” The Washington Post reported that to add $20 million to DHS’s “commemorative events” line, OMB drew on money the 2025 law gave CBP; a House budget committee report said that line was intended for “Line-of-Duty death memorials, Department or agency anniversaries, and commendation ceremonies.”

    The New York Times reported, citing people familiar with the matter, that “President Donald Trump personally instructed his budget director to use taxpayer money for TV ads praising him and his presidency.”

    CNN ↗Washington Post ↗The New York Times (via The Seattle Times) ↗

  3. Mon Oct 5 The administration

    After criticism from both parties, Trump posted, “This is a rather standard thing to do but, rather than doing that, although nothing will make them happy, I have decided to do the Patriotic Ads, among others, and pay for them myself, and with money I raised for MAGA, Inc.” A White House official told CBS News the post “was not referring to reimbursing the federal government” for ads already bought.

    Asked the next day whether he would repay the money already spent, he said, “we’ll decide,” the AP reported.

    NBC News ↗AP ↗CBS News ↗AP ↗Washington Examiner ↗

  4. Sun Oct 11 The courts

    In Common Cause v. Department of Homeland Security, Judge Jennifer L. Rochon of the Southern District of New York stayed CBP’s $20 million purchase order and OMB’s reallocation of the money and ordered the government to cancel remaining placements, “including those placements for the evening of October 11, 2026,” for 14 days. The Justice Department had argued an order was unnecessary because “the alleged offending conduct will end tomorrow.”

    In her opinion the next day, Rochon wrote that “Defendants do not contest the merits of Plaintiffs’ claims” and found the plaintiffs likely to succeed in showing the ads “were disseminated to support Republican candidates and impact the midterm elections.” She called DHS’s statement that it had “no plans” for more buys “equivocal” and cited Trump’s October 5 post calling the spending a “standard thing to do.”

    Common Cause v. Department of Homeland Securit… ↗Common Cause v. Department of Homeland Security ↗AP ↗NBC News ↗CBS News ↗

  5. Sun Oct 11 The courts

    The plaintiffs told the court that, by AdImpact’s data, the ads “ran in nearly 400 spots on programs that began airing at 7 p.m. Eastern last night,” after the order took effect, including during CBS’s “60 Minutes” and ABC’s “America’s Funniest Home Videos,” and kept running the next day. The government’s status report explained that “Agency counsel did not become aware of Government counsel’s email until this morning” and said, “The undersigned apologizes to the Court and the plaintiffs.” The plaintiffs said they “do not presently seek contempt sanctions.” The judge set a conference for October 14.

    Common Cause v. Department of Homeland Security ↗Common Cause v. Department of Homeland Security ↗CNN ↗Washington Examiner ↗

Checked against the record

The claims and the record

What the administration, its allies and the ad itself say, in their own words wherever they put it that way, next to what the documents and the reporting show.

What was said What the record shows
What was said “This is a rather standard thing to do” President Trump, on Truth Social, October 5, 2026 What the record shows A federal judge cited this very post as a reason the spending might recur, and the government did not defend the ads’ legality in court. Judge Rochon wrote that “Defendants do not contest the merits of Plaintiffs’ claims” and cited the post as a reason she could not be confident the spending would stop. A Reuters/Ipsos poll found 86 percent of adults think it is inappropriate to use taxpayer money for election-related TV ads featuring the president or his cabinet.

Common Cause v. Department of Homeland Security ↗The Hill ↗GV Wire (Reuters) ↗

What was said “I’m not promoting a candidate. I’m not promoting myself because I’m not running for office.” President Trump, September 30, 2026 What the record shows The ads feature him, and one is his own 2024 campaign spot with the government line added. The Associated Press called one government-paid spot “virtually identical to one that aired in 2024.” Axios reported that Trump “is personally selecting which government-funded ads his administration is airing ahead of the midterms.” He is not on the ballot this year, which is the White House’s argument that the ads are not campaign ads.

The Hill ↗AP ↗Axios ↗

What was said “We are proud at this Department of Justice to celebrate 250 years of our great country and our historic work to make America safe again at President Trump’s direction.” A Justice Department spokesperson, on its banner What the record shows The banners carry the sitting president’s portrait and his slogans. The Justice Department’s banners show Trump’s official portrait above “MAKE AMERICA SAFE AGAIN,” under $946,960 in contracts. Labor’s put him over “American Workers First.” The FAA’s banner contract runs through 2027.

CNN ↗Politico / E&E News ↗CNN ↗The Independent ↗

What was said “we’re reinforcing the material at no charge to taxpayers, so our big, beautiful banners can securely stay up in celebration of America’s 250th birthday” Courtney Parella, Labor Department spokesperson What the record shows The banners themselves were bought with public money. The department confirmed it spent roughly $6,000 on its banners. Contracts for banners of the president found so far, across five agencies, total $1.12 million.

CNN ↗The Independent ↗Politico / E&E News ↗

What was said “The press, in some cases, reported inaccurately or not at all on the Administration’s many record breaking accomplishments on behalf of all Americans.” Kaelan Dorr, White House head of digital strategy, on Trump TV What the record shows The stream is the administration’s own past video, launched as the television pool stood down. It carries official video, not reporting, and the White House already streamed the president’s events on the same channels. It launched the day the five television pool networks suspended pooled coverage, three days after the ban on CNN, MS NOW and Politico, and opened with a two-month-old clip.

NOTUS ↗Time ↗Barrett Media ↗

What was said “paid for by the U.S. government” The ad’s own disclaimer What the record shows The money is Customs and Border Protection funding, a Republican senator confirmed; the administration still has not said so. The Wall Street Journal reported, and Sen. Susan Collins confirmed, that the money came from Customs and Border Protection funds in the 2025 reconciliation law. DHS referred questions to the White House. CBS News reported that the government produced the ads and bought the air time through an ad agency, which it did not name. AdImpact estimated the first buy at $14,000 and more than $2.5 million over the first week of three ads.

Associated Press ↗CBS News ↗NBC News ↗AP ↗

What was said “Patriotism isn’t partisan.” The White House, “Presidential Public Service Announcements Are Nothing New” What the record shows The precedents it cites were campaigns about policies, and GAO faulted two of them. The Associated Press noted that the earlier campaigns promoted particular policies, not the president in office. NBC News noted GAO faulted the Bush Medicare campaign for not disclosing the government as its source and Obama’s EPA campaign for violating “publicity or propaganda and anti-lobbying provisions.” In the White House’s favor, Axios noted that “GAO has said concealment of the government’s role is central to a finding of covert propaganda,” and these spots label themselves.

The White House ↗AP ↗NBC News ↗Axios ↗

What was said “The President is not on the ballot and the ads don’t have a call to action.” A White House official, to CBS News What the record shows Experts told CBS the ads likely do not break election law. The propaganda restriction is a separate question. Columbia law professor Richard Briffault: “It doesn’t appear to be supporting or endorsing a candidate for public office.” He agreed with Sen. Maggie Hassan, though, that there are questions under the propaganda law. Hassan wrote that the ad “appears to run afoul of federal prohibitions against the use of appropriated funds as part of ‘a general propaganda effort designed to aid a political party or candidates’”.

CBS News ↗

What was said “These public service announcements are about reminding Americans to love their country and understand what makes it worth defending, at home, at our borders, and abroad.” The White House, in a statement on the ad What the record shows It carries the president’s campaign themes, though it names no candidate. The Associated Press: the ad “does not say who voters should support in the midterms, but it meshes with campaign messaging from Trump and other Republicans.” It pairs the “largest tax cuts in history” with a 2024 Republican convention clip of Dana White praising Trump, over a song repeating “love me.”

Associated Press ↗HuffPost ↗

Both sides, in their own words

Who objected, and who defended it

The strongest version of each side, quoted. Republicans are among the objectors: a senator and a former congresswoman, and a second senator is quoted at the top of this page.

Objected

“It’s a great message. I like the message, but it shouldn’t be paid for with taxpayer dollars.”

Sen. John ThuneSenate Majority Leader, Republican of South Dakota

The Hill ↗NBC News ↗

“I don’t think any public official, including President Trump or Kristi Noem or John Kennedy, should spend public money on private ads for themselves.”

Sen. John KennedyRepublican of Louisiana, on “Face the Nation”

CBS News ↗

“Don’t worry, using taxpayer dollars to run ominous campaign ads of the President has been done before and is completely legal… in banana republics.”

Rep. Thomas MassieRepublican of Kentucky, on the campaign-ad rerun

CNN ↗

“Not only is this a terrible waste of Americans’ hard-earned money, it is clearly against the law”

Sen. Adam SchiffDemocrat of California, on the banners

The Independent ↗

“Nothing says Justice is Blind like hanging a Dear Leader Banner at DOJ.”

Barbara ComstockFormer Republican congresswoman, on the Justice Department banner

Mediaite ↗

“You know who else does this? Russia, China, and Iran to name a few.”

Stephanie GrishamTrump’s press secretary in his first term, on Trump TV

Time ↗

“This is the sort of government propaganda one might expect in North Korea, not the United States of America”

Sens. Patty Murray and Jack Reed, Reps. Rosa DeLauro and Steny HoyerThe top Democratic appropriators, on the ads

CBS News ↗

“America cannot have state TV”

Weijia JiangCBS News, former president of the White House Correspondents’ Association

Time ↗

Defended

“Now, if somebody said that that’s wrong, I’ll gladly pay the money, but these are ads for the country”

President TrumpIn the Oval Office, September 30

The Hill ↗USA Today (via AOL) ↗

“When this president tells Americans that liberty is worth defending, it’s suddenly a problem.”

Sen. Cynthia LummisRepublican of Wyoming, blocking a resolution against the ads

Washington Post ↗Daily Caller ↗

“the unequivocal leader, best messenger, and unmatched motivator for the Republican Party”

Davis IngleWhite House spokesperson, on the criticism of the ads

The Independent ↗

“educational and unapologetically patriotic”

The White HouseIn a statement on the ad

Associated Press ↗

“The President is not on the ballot and the ads don’t have a call to action.”

A White House officialTo CBS News, on the ads

CBS News ↗

“Don’t let the Fake News get away with their lies about our epic Public Service Announcements that have been running on tv.”

Steven CheungWhite House communications director

NBC News ↗

“We are proud at this Department of Justice to celebrate 250 years of our great country”

A Justice Department spokespersonOn the banner at its headquarters

CNN ↗

“The banners were originally displayed for Labor Day. After tremendous positive response, we’re reinforcing the material at no charge to taxpayers”

Courtney ParellaLabor Department spokesperson, on its banners

CNN ↗

“a livestream of the Administration’s greatest hits, unfiltered”

Kaelan DorrWhite House head of digital strategy, on Trump TV

NOTUS ↗

“It’s a complete disgrace that Pencil-Neck Adam Schiff is willing to trash the United States of America during its semiquincentennial celebration simply because he hates President Trump.”

Davis IngleWhite House spokesman, on Schiff’s banner findings

The Independent ↗

What governs the money

The rules

The restrictions that apply to public money spent on a president's image. None has been tested against any of this; no ruling on it is on the record.

  1. Since 1951

    The propaganda restriction

    Federal spending laws have barred taxpayer spending “for publicity or propaganda purposes” since 1951, according to Schiff’s report. The statutes do not define propaganda, the report notes, but “prior prohibited uses of funds have been classified as self-aggrandizement, purely partisan materials, or covert propaganda.” On September 25 Public Citizen asked the Government Accountability Office to find that the ads violate it; GAO has not responded publicly.

    Sen. Schiff ↗Washington Examiner ↗Public Citizen ↗

  2. Hatch Act

    Limits on federal employees

    The Hatch Act limits partisan political activity by federal employees. It does not apply to the president. Rep. Jamie Raskin’s point about the ad is that it would be a violation “for any government employees who worked on it or used government resources to make it.”

    Mediaite ↗Washington Post ↗HuffPost ↗

  3. Mar 2026

    The administration’s own precedent

    A $220 million taxpayer-funded ad campaign featuring a cabinet secretary ended with her firing. DHS had invoked a national emergency declaration to skip competitive bidding.

    NBC News ↗ProPublica ↗

Reading the record

Our take

Our take — opinion, not reporting

Each item here has a defense on its own terms. A president may publish video, and agencies may mark an anniversary. Put together, they describe what the propaganda restriction exists to prevent: public money spent to keep one politician’s face and message in front of the public, most visibly in the weeks before an election.

The ads began as the smallest line in the ledger and are now the largest, and they were always the plainest. One uses the president’s campaign themes, a convention clip and a song that repeats “love me”; another is his 2024 campaign ad with the campaign ending cut off. Both carry a government disclaimer. Republicans in both chambers saw the problem at once. The money turned out to be border-security funds, which a Republican senator confirmed before the administration did. When the spending reached court, the government did not defend its legality, and a federal judge stopped it.

The anniversary defense deserves a fair hearing, and the banners answer it themselves. They carry the sitting president’s portrait and his own slogans, one of them on the headquarters of the department meant to be independent of him, and one contract runs into 2027.

Standards

Method

Where this comes from

  • This page is built from 8 Trump Tracker entries, each through the tracker’s validation protocol: two independent sources for any core claim, primary documents preferred, single-sourced claims labeled.
  • This page answers one question, about public money promoting the president. The White House ballroom, which raises a different one, about donors and access, has its own page. For the wider catalog of Trump’s name and face on government, from the passport to the $250 bill, see the research site’s Government as Brand page.
  • Right-leaning outlets are cited where they covered the story, including Breitbart and the Washington Examiner.

How it is checked

  • An automated check runs on every change: every link on this page must appear in a seed entry’s sources, and every quotation must appear word for word in a seed entry. Either failure blocks the page.
  • Before publishing, each quotation and figure was also checked against the saved text of the specific source attached to it. That check found errors in four of the underlying tracker entries, which were corrected there first and are listed under Corrections.
  • One source, a paywalled Washington Post article on the ad, could not be read in full. Nothing on this page rests on it alone.
  • Where an account rests on anonymous sources, the page says so where it appears.

What we mean by the record

  • It means what the documents say: contracts, releases, rulings, sworn testimony and the text of what was published. It does not mean our reading of them.
  • Our opinion is confined to the labeled take near the end of the page. It is set apart and easy to skip; you do not have to share it to use the rest.
  • An amount in the ledger is a contract value or a release of funds as reported. It is not necessarily what has been paid out.

Corrections

  • Corrections are made openly. This log covers the page and the tracker entries it draws on.
  • September 24, 2026Before this page was published, its sources were checked against the saved text of each article. The 2025 banner entry it draws on described the Labor Department’s banner as 88 feet long. The 88-foot signs were Health and Human Services’ “Make America Healthy Again” banners, which this page does not count as spending on the president’s image. The ad entry has also been brought up to date with the White House’s statement defending the ad.
  • September 28, 2026Earlier versions of this page said that, as of September 25, no complaint or request for a GAO opinion was on the record. Public Citizen had filed one with GAO and the Office of Special Counsel that day. The ledger’s figure for the ads, $14,000, was AdImpact’s estimate of the first buy; it has been replaced with AdImpact’s running estimate, more than $1.7 million.
  • September 25, 2026This page was narrowed to one question, whether public money is promoting the president himself. The White House ballroom, which it first included, now has its own page, since its story is about donors and access. The administration’s answers on the banners were added.